Spatial perception
Recognize relations, depth, and orientation already present in an image.
Vision-language models struggle to maintain geometric consistency across fragments, viewpoints, and reasoning steps. This workshop examines these limitations and methods for improving spatial reasoning as task complexity increases.
The program brings together researchers in multimodal learning, embodied AI, and constraint reasoning through invited talks, contributed papers, posters, a competition, and a panel.
Recognize relations, depth, and orientation already present in an image.
Construct and maintain globally consistent structures under geometric constraints.
Spatial relations, depth, size, orientation, perspective-taking, and generalization across viewpoints.
Combining appearance evidence with geometric constraints in reassembly, multi-step assembly, and grid reasoning.
Visual tokenization, resolution, positional encodings, spatial memory, combinatorial decoding, and locating where geometric information is lost.
Pairing VLM proposals with constraint solvers, search, and classical methods for geometric compatibility.
Spatial pretext tasks, exactly verifiable construction tasks, and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards.
Uniqueness guarantees, machine-checkable answers, contamination resistance, and metrics that distinguish local from global correctness.
Manipulation, assembly, navigation, and world models—and whether benchmark gains transfer to physical competence.
We invite research and position papers on the topics above.
This workshop is non-archival.
Up to 7 pages of main content, with no page limit for references and appendices.
Up to 4 pages of main content and up to 2 pages of references.
Recently published work, for presentation only. A separate submission process for these papers will be announced later.
Every accepted paper will be presented as a poster. Selected papers will also receive an oral presentation slot.
Recover the original positions of shuffled, interlocking image pieces using visual evidence and geometric constraints.
Each instance is verified by a constraint solver to have exactly one solution.
Planned competition · Dates, data, baselines, and evaluation code to be announced.
Use API-only models with zero-shot prompting.
Fine-tune open-weight models or apply reinforcement learning post-training under a declared compute budget.
Combine vision-language models with external constraint solvers.
University of Texas at Austin
Four talks · 15 minutes each
University of Toronto
Georgia Institute of Technology
Four talks · 15 minutes each
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill